Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:01:19]

ALL MY SCREENS ARE FROZEN EXCEPT MY OWN PICTURE.

IS THAT ANY BETTER SIR? NO.

YEAH, YOU'RE HAVING A LITTLE BIT OF CONNECTION ISSUE, SIR.

I DON'T KNOW WHY I JUST GOT A MESSAGE SAYING THAT EVERYTHING WAS FINE WITH MY SYSTEM.

ARE WE LIVE YET ON HOMTV? YOU ARE LIVE. HOPEFULLY, EVERYONE CAN HEAR ME.

I'M HAVING A LITTLE TROUBLE, IT SEEMS, WITH MY COMPUTER.

[1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER]

GOOD AFTERNOON, IT'S A LITTLE AFTER AFTERNOON AND WE'RE DOING A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TOWNSHIP BOARD ON DECEMBER 18TH.

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.

AND IF WE COULD ALL SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

OF ALLEGIANCE] OK, WE NEED A ROLL CALL FROM OUR CLERK.

CALL] ONE ABSENT AT THIS POINT? ONE ABSENT. ALL RIGHT.

WE HAVE A PRESENTATION, I BELIEVE, OR ARE WE JUST GOING TO-- NO, WE DON'T HAVE A PRESENTATION. WE HAVE A [INAUDIBLE] AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS. MR. GEBES, DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS? THERE ARE ACTUALLY SEVERAL CITIZENS IN THE MEETING AREA, AND THEY CAN, OF COURSE, USE THE RAISE HAND FUNCTION IF THEY'D CARE TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT AT THIS TIME.

ALTERNATIVELY, WE CAN TAKE CALLS AT FIVE ONE SEVEN THREE FOUR NINE ONE, TWO, THREE, TWO FOR ANYONE WHO'S JOINING US VIA ONE OF OUR INTERNET STREAMS AND OR COMCAST HOMTV.

ONE MORE TIME THAT NUMBER FIVE ONE SEVEN THREE FOUR NINE ONE, TWO, THREE, TWO.

I DIDN'T SEE ANY HANDS GO UP IN THE ATTENDEE AREA AND I'LL PAUSE FOR JUST A SECOND MORE TO SEE IF WE GET A PHONE CALL.

BUT IT SOUNDS QUIET AT THIS POINT.

I JUST MENTIONED THAT THERE WILL BE A SECOND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT NEAR THE END

[00:05:01]

OF THE MEETING. THIS IS THE FIRST OF THE TWO AND YOU GET THREE MINUTES IF YOU DO DECIDE TO SPEAK AND IDENTIFY YOURSELF WITH YOUR ADDRESS.

ANYTHING, MR. GEBES? WE HAVE NO CALLS, SIR. THANK YOU.

WITH THAT WE WILL GO ON TO APPROVE OF THE AGENDA.

[6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA]

MS. JACKSON. MOVE APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS WRITTEN.

MR. DESCHAINE. SUPPORT.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THE AGENDA BEFORE WE VOTE ON IT? ALL RIGHT, THEN, CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE, MS. GUTHRIE. ALL RIGHT.

CLERK GUTHRIE VOTES YES.

TREASURER DESCHAINE. YES.

TRUSTEE JACKSON.

YES.

TRUSTEE OPSOMMER.

YES. TRUSTEE WISINSKI.

YES. AND SUPERVISOR STYKA.

YES. YOU CAN STILL CALL SUNDLAND, EVEN THOUGH SHE'S NOT HERE.

OK.

TRUSTEE SUNDLAND. ABSENT. OK.

SHE MAY SHOW UP, YOU KNOW, LET'S HOPE SO.

ALL RIGHT. I KEEP LOOKING FOR HER.

YOU NEVER KNOW. THAT'S RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. I WILL GO ON NOW ON THE DISCUSSION ITEMS.

[7A. Township’s Ongoing COVID-19 Response]

IT'S LISTED AS TWO.

SORT OF ONE, IN A WAY.

CALL ON THE TOWNSHIP MANAGER TO LEAD THIS DISCUSSION.

THANK YOU, MR. SUPERVISOR, AND GOOD AFTERNOON, BOARD.

THERE'S REALLY TWO COMPONENTS WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT THIS AFTERNOON, AND WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME ON A SPECIAL MEETING.

THE FIRST IS, WHAT ARE WE DOING WITH OUR COVID RESPONSE, SOME OF THE POLICE, FIRE AND THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS.

AND THEN THE SECOND ONE WOULD BE TO TALK ABOUT A PROGRAM.

THE ROUND TWO OF A PROGRAM THAT THE BOARD DID SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.

SO AT THIS TIME, I'D LIKE TO CALL ON JUST A FEW DIRECTORS TO GIVE A BRIEF UPDATE ON WHAT WE'RE DOING AS FAR AS OUR COVID RESPONSE AND THEN RESPOND TO THIS IS OUR RESPONSE NON BUSINESS [INAUDIBLE]. SO CALL OUT OUR H.R.

DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR [INAUDIBLE] FIRST.

GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYBODY.

HELLO, BOARD. FIRST OFF, I JUST LIKE TO START BY THANKING YOU FOR HELPING US IMPLEMENT THE SAFE WORK FROM HOME PROGRAM, WHICH WE BEGAN ON NOVEMBER 9TH WITH THE THANKS TO YOU AND OUR IT DEPARTMENT FOR GETTING EVERYTHING TO OUR STAFF SO THAT WE COULD WORK FROM HOME SAFELY FOR THOSE WHO ARE ABLE TO DO SO.

WE WERE ABLE TO REDUCE THE HEADCOUNT IN OUR BUILDINGS WHILE STILL BEING ABLE TO CONTINUE OPERATIONS AND SERVE THE PUBLIC.

WE'VE BEEN DOING VERY WELL IN HONORING OUR SAFETY PROTOCOL, WEARING OUR MASKS, WEARING THEM CORRECTLY, SOCIAL DISTANCING, ELIMINATING IN-PERSON MEETINGS AND DOING ALL KINDS OF THINGS VIRTUALLY, AS YOU KNOW, IN OUR DAILY LIVES.

ZOOM IS, IT'S OUR THING.

IT'S OUR WAY OF STAYING CONNECTED AND COMMUNICATING.

LEADERSHIP AND STAFF HAVE BEEN EXCEPTIONAL IN THIS PROGRAM.

SINCE I EVEN GOT HERE, IF THERE ARE EVER ANY QUESTIONS, CONCERNS OR SYMPTOMS, PEOPLE ARE CONTACTING ME RIGHT AWAY.

I EVEN GET PHONE CALLS ON THE WEEKENDS JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHAT THEY SHOULD DO AND THEY WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING.

SO THEY'RE STAYING CONNECTED WITH ME.

AND THAT IS EVERYTHING IN IMPLEMENTING THIS AND MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE ALL STAYING SAFE.

I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH OUR FIRST RESPONDERS PRIMARILY THROUGH BILL [INAUDIBLE], OUR EMT TRAINING CHIEF.

AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH POLICE AND FIRE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET ANYONE TESTED WHEN IT'S APPROPRIATE. AND SOMETIMES WE'RE EVEN ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF RAPID TESTING FOR FREE THROUGH CERTAIN PROGRAMS THAT ARE IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.

WE'LL SOON BE GETTING INTO VOLUNTARY VACCINES.

MORE TO COME ON THAT INFORMATION.

IT'S STILL DEVELOPING AS WE SPEAK.

AND ALSO WE WILL BE DOING A MASK UPDATE.

WE JUST RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH THAT THEY'RE ELIMINATING NECK GAITERS, BANDANAS AND THOSE LITTLE VENTED MASKS THAT MIGHT HAVE A LITTLE VENT ON THE SIDE OF IT. THEY'RE TAKING THOSE OUT OF THE SAFETY PROTOCOL.

SO WE'LL BE SENDING UP AN UPDATE TO ALL STAFF AND MANAGERS ON THAT HERE SHORTLY.

BUT THAT'S IT FROM THE HR SIDE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE'LL MOVE AROUND TO JUST A FEW OF THESE AND THEN WE'LL TURN IT BACK TO YOU, MR. SUPERVISOR, WITH THE BOARD QUESTIONS.

THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS YOU CAN'T DO BUT DIRECT YOUR [INAUDIBLE] ABOUT SOME THINGS YOU CAN DO. SO AN UPDATE ON WHERE OUR PARKS DEPARTMENT FROM DIRECTOR [INAUDIBLE] WHAT WE'RE DOING DURING COVID.

GREAT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, FRANK. GOOD AFTERNOON, SUPERVISOR STYKA AND BOARD MEMBERS.

YOU KNOW, WE ARE THE DEPARTMENT THAT ENGAGES WITH THE COMMUNITY.

AND OF COURSE, WITH COVID THAT'S BEEN A LITTLE DIFFICULT.

BUT I'VE GOT TO TELL YOU, OUR STAFF HAS REALLY PLOWED THROUGH THIS.

WE HAVE STILL BEEN ABLE TO MAINTAIN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.

AND I JUST LIKE TO GO OVER A FEW OF THOSE RIGHT NOW.

WE HAVE HAD A VERY SUCCESSFUL SENIOR EXERCISE PROGRAM THAT TYPICALLY OPERATES IN THE MALL

[00:10:05]

FOOD COURT ON MONDAY, WEDNESDAY AND FRIDAY MORNING.

WE'LL HAVE APPROXIMATELY 60 SENIORS THAT SHOW UP FOR THAT.

AND WE DID TAKE A PAUSE EARLY ON, BUT THEN THEY ENDED UP MOVING OUTDOORS TO THE BASKETBALL COURT AT NANCY MOORE PARK AND THEY'VE STAYED MASKED.

THEY BROUGHT THEIR OWN CHAIRS BECAUSE A LOT OF IT IS JUST CHAIR EXERCISE.

AND THEN ALSO WHEN THE WEATHER GOT A LITTLE COLDER, THEY MOVED TO THE FORMER FARMER'S MARKET PAVILION WHERE THERE ARE SOME WALLS UP AND WE ACTUALLY PUT SOME TARPS IN THERE TO MAKE IT A LITTLE WARMER. BUT THEY STAYED STRONG UNTIL JUST THIS PAST MONDAY, I THINK WAS THEIR LAST DAY. SO THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE A PAUSE NOW UNTIL SPRING TIME.

BUT THEY REALLY, YOU KNOW, THEY REALLY WANTED TO GET TOGETHER, BUT THEY DID SO SAFELY.

ALSO EMMA WITH OUR LAND STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM, SHE HAD A NUMBER OF WORK DAYS AND A LOT OF IT WAS JUST WITH INDIVIDUAL FAMILIES AND ALSO OFFERED VIRTUAL TRAININGS IN OUR FOUR PARKS AND OUR LAND PRESERVES.

HARRIS NATURE CENTER OFFERED PRIVATE LESSONS FOR FAMILIES.

I CALL THEM PRIVATE LESSONS.

I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE CALL THEM TECHNICALLY, BUT FAMILIES COULD COME IN ON THEIR OWN AND GET AND THE CHILDREN COULD RECEIVE A NATURE LESSON OF SORTS THAT WE WORK HARD TO FOLLOW THE CURRICULUM FROM THOSE SCHOOL PROGRAMS. AND THAT'S BEEN SUCCESSFUL.

WE ALSO HAVE VIRTUAL CHIPMUNK STORY TIME FOR TODDLERS AND THEN WALKS IN THE WOODS WITH DOG HOWL AT THE MOON AND ALL SORTS OF WALKS ON OUR TRAILS.

THE DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE SEVENTY FIVE HUNTERS IN THIS PROGRAM.

SO FAR THEY'VE KILLED I THINK ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY DEER AND WE'RE ON TWO THOUSAND ACRES AND WE'VE DONATED ABOUT TWENTY TWO HUNDRED POUNDS OF VENISON TO THE COMMUNITY.

AND SO THAT'S OVER A TON, OVER A TON OF MEAT IN THIS PROGRAM SO FAR.

AND THEN ALSO MIKE DEVLIN, WE'VE GOTTEN INTO NOW THAT IT'S THE HOLIDAY SEASON, THE DRIVE THRU SANTA PROGRAM.

WE BROUGHT THAT BACK AND THAT WAS ON TUESDAY NIGHT, WEDNESDAY NIGHT AND AGAIN TONIGHT.

THOSE PROGRAMS HAD PEOPLE HAD TO PREREGISTER.

THEY GET TWELVE MINUTES WITH SANTA AND IT'S ALL DISTANCED.

THE CHILDREN STAY IN THE CARS, THEY HAVE TO WEAR A MASK, THEY HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH SANTA. THE PARENTS AHEAD OF TIME, SEND THE CHILDREN'S NAMES AND NAMES OF THE PETS AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS SO SANTA CAN HAVE THIS VERY INDIVIDUAL TYPE CONVERSATION.

AND IT'S BEEN HUGELY SUCCESSFUL.

THEY GET PHOTOS, SANTA STANDS OUTSIDE THE CAR AT THE END OF THE CAR.

AND ACTUALLY, IT'S BEEN WONDERFUL.

ALSO, WE'VE WORKED WITH OUR COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT FOR A SANTA VIDEO PROGRAM WHERE THE CHILDREN SEND IN VIDEOS.

SANTA HAS RECORDED VIDEOS BACK TO SEND TO THE CHILDREN, AND THAT'S BEEN FUN.

AND THEN ALSO WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON SINCE MID-MAY HAS BEEN OUR FARMERS MARKET.

WE BROUGHT THAT AND WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY MANAGED WITH-- THERE'S BEEN DAYS WITH THREE THOUSAND VISITORS AT THE MARKET AND WITH OUR VENDORS, WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY DO THAT WITH NO OUTBREAKS.

AND WE'VE BEEN VERY, VERY HAPPY WITH THAT PROGRAM.

OUR DOG PARKS, WE OPENED THE LARGE DOG PARK.

OBVIOUSLY, OUR SMALL DOG PARK OPENED LAST YEAR.

WE HAVE OVER FIVE HUNDRED MEMBERS IN THAT.

AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN USING THAT.

OUR PICKLEBALL COURTS, OUR SENIORS HAVE STILL BEEN PLAYING PICKLEBALL SAFELY.

AND THEN, OF COURSE, OUR PARKS AND LAND PRESERVES HAVE BEEN A GODSEND TO MANY FOLKS IN THE COMMUNITY WHO COULD JUST CASUALLY GET OUTSIDE, GET SOME EXERCISE AND BE OUT IN NATURE. SO EVEN THOUGH OUR SPORTS YOUTH AND ADULT SPORTS PROGRAMS HAVE HAD TO TAKE A BACKSEAT THIS YEAR, WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY ENGAGE THE COMMUNITY.

ALSO, I DIDN'T MENTION THE SENIOR CENTER.

THERE HAVE BEEN CELEBRATIONS VIRTUALLY, EDUCATION PROGRAMS, EXERCISE PROGRAMS, AND ALSO, WELL CHECK PHONE CALLS TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE SENIOR CENTER ON A REGULAR BASIS.

I BELIEVE ONCE EVERY TWO WEEKS THERE'S A PERSONAL PHONE CALL THAT GOES TO ALL THE MEMBERS JUST TO CHECK ON THEM. SO WE HAVE BEEN BUSY HERE IN THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND LOOK FORWARD TO THE VACCINES AND GETTING BACK AT IT WITH SOME OF OUR REGULAR PROGRAMING. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, DIRECTOR [INAUDIBLE]. IT'S A GREAT UPDATE.

OVER TO CHIEF PLAGA WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

AFTERNOON SUPERVISOR STYKA, BOARD MEMBERS.

AT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, WE'VE HAD THE ACTUALLY SIX EMPLOYEES THAT HAVE CONTRACTED TO COVID-19 VIRUS.

FIVE OF THOSE ARE BACK TO WORK AND ONE IS ON THE MEND AS WE SPEAK.

OUR TASKS, IT'S DIFFICULT TO DO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO REMOTELY, BUT WE HAVE BEGUN TAKING CALLS FOR SERVICE REMOTELY, TELEPHONES, UTILIZING OUR ONLINE SERVICES.

WE ALSO ARE UTILIZING MASKS AND THE FOLLOWING THE PROTOCOL SET FORTH FOR BEST PRACTICES, FOR KEEPING CARS CLEAN.

WE'VE ADJUSTED THE SHIFTS SO THAT THE OVERLAPPING OFFICERS AND THE PLATOONS ARE ACTUALLY WORKING AND THEY'RE NOT BEING EXPOSED TO EACH OTHER AS MUCH AS THEY WOULD BE IN A NORMAL ROTATION SHIFT. SO THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE'RE CONDUCTING HERE AT THE POLICE

[00:15:02]

DEPARTMENT. AND UNFORTUNATELY, SOMETIMES WE JUST HAVE TO COME IN CONTACT WITH PEOPLE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP CHIEF PLAGA.

CHIEF HAMEL WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. YES, SUPERVISOR STYKA AND BOARD AND MANAGER.

THANKS AND GOOD AFTERNOON.

JUST LIKE KEN, WE'VE HAD ONE CONFIRMED BACK TO WORK AND THEN WE'VE GOT ONE PENDING RIGHT NOW. OTHER THAN BASICALLY MAINTAINING OUR ENGINEERING CONTROLS, WE'VE BEEN PRETTY SUCCESSFUL IN PROTECTING OUR TROOPS AS THEY GO OUT AND RESPOND AND WORKING WITH PATIENTS, SO THAT'S GONE REALLY WELL.

WE'VE HELPED A LOT OF THE NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS AND JUST WANTED TO TOUCH ON A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT ABBY MENTIONED.

A FEW MONTHS AGO, CHIEF [INAUDIBLE] STARTED A PROGRAM LOCALLY WHERE WE WOULD TEST OUR OWN FIRST RESPONDERS, POLICE, FIRE, AND IT WORKED OUT REALLY WELL.

WE PARTNERED WITH DELHI IN OUR TRI COUNTY, WHICH MANAGES OUR PROTOCOLS FOR EMS. THAT'S ACTUALLY GONE PRETTY VIRAL.

AND WE'VE BEEN ACTUALLY WORKING MAINLY BILL HAS, WITH PEOPLE IN THE [INAUDIBLE] AND OTHER COUNTIES ACROSS THE STATE THAT HAVE ACTUALLY MIMICKED OUR PROGRAM.

SO IT'S REALLY WORKED OUT WELL AND SAVE TIME TRYING TO WAIT IN LINE AT A HOSPITAL OR A PROMPT CARE PLACE LIKE THAT TO GET A TEST AND THEN WAIT TO THREE TO FIVE DAYS FOR RESULTS WHERE WE CAN GET RESULTS OVERNIGHT.

WE ARE ALSO WORKING ON WORKING WITH A LOCAL FACILITY TO ACTUALLY TEST THE RAPID TEST BECAUSE YOU'RE STILL SUPPOSED TO GET THE PCR WITH THE RAPID TEST, BECAUSE IF IT'S POSITIVE, IT'S GENERALLY POSITIVE.

BUT IF IT'S NEGATIVE, IT COULD BE A FALSE NEGATIVE.

SO YOU'RE STILL SUPPOSED TO GET A PCR WITH THAT.

SO WE'RE WAITING FOR THAT PILOT PROGRAM TO START UP.

AND THEN THE PLAN IS THAT WE WOULD DO THE RAPID TEST IN THE MORNINGS PRIOR TO WORK.

AND THAT WAY, BY 15 MINUTES OR SO INTO THE JOB, WE WOULD KNOW IF SOMEONE'S POSITIVE AND WOULD REACT FROM THERE. SO JUST A LITTLE MORE PREVENTATIVE THAT WE'RE WORKING ON FOR THE FUTURE. OTHER THAN THAT EVERYBODY'S HEALTHY, READY FOR THE HOLIDAYS.

RUN VOLUMES KIND OF GONE UP.

OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF COVID OUT THERE AND OTHER THINGS.

SO WE'RE DOING WELL AND JUST HAPPY TO SERVE.

SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHIEF. WE APPRECIATE YOUR LEADERSHIP.

DIRECTOR CLARK, A BRIEF UPDATE ON OUR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.

WHERE DO THE MAJOR PROJECTS STAND? THE MAJOR PROJECTS THAT-- GOOD AFTERNOON, TOWNSHIP BOARD MEMBERS.

MAJOR PROJECT STATUS FOR VILLAGE OF OKEMOS IS A DEMOLITION FOR THE FIRST PHASE.

THE BUILDING SHOULD BE DOWN BY THE END OF JANUARY.

[INAUDIBLE] HOPES TO HAVE OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO ALLOW STAFF IN AT THE END OF THE YEAR WITH AN OPENING IN JANUARY.

[INAUDIBLE] IS JUST ABOUT THE SAME THING.

THEY'RE HOPING THAT THEY'LL BE OPEN IN JANUARY.

I BELIEVE THAT THEY'VE HAD SOME STALLS IN SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT A LOT OF OUR BUSINESSES ARE SUFFERING WITH THAT IS ABLE TO STAY OPEN.

A LOT OF OUR [INAUDIBLE] BUSINESSES TOO, LIKE EVEN MATTRESS STORE SETS.

THEY'RE ABLE TO SERVE THEIR CUSTOMERS, BUT THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO GET ACCESS TO THE PRODUCTS. BUDDY'S PIZZA, WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY COMMENTS BACK FROM ENGINEERING AND BUILDING TEAMS SINCE THEY CAME ABOUT THEIR SITE PLAN IN NOVEMBER.

WE'RE GOING TO FOLLOW UP WITH THEM.

WE HAVEN'T HEARD THAT THEY ARE NOT MOVING FORWARD, BUT THEY HAVE NOT COME BACK AFTER OUR COMMENTS.

AND [INAUDIBLE] COOPER WILL SUBMIT A PLAN SOON AND WE'RE HOPING TO HAVE THAT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT START OFF IN 2021.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, DIRECTOR CLARK.

DIRECTOR KIESELBACH QUICKLY, WHAT IS YOUR COMPARISON TO TWENTY NINETEEN INVESTMENT VERSUS TWENTY TWENTY INVESTMENT? CAN YOU TELL THE BOARD WHERE WE ARE YEAR TO YEAR COMPARISON? GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE.

WE HAVEN'T HAD AS GOOD OF A BUILDING SEASON AS WE THOUGHT WE ORIGINALLY WERE GOING TO HAVE . BUT IT ISN'T BAD WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SHUT DOWN FOR TWO MONTHS THIS YEAR WE DID COME BACK. UNFORTUNATELY SOME OF THE PROJECTS WE WERE ANTICIPATING ON THIS YEAR EITHER ARE POSTPONED OR ARE NOT GOING TO BE BUILT NOW.

AT THE END OF NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR, WE WERE AT ABOUT FIFTY FIVE POINT FOUR MILLION DOLLARS IN CONSTRUCTION VALUE.

THIS YEAR WE'RE AT FORTY EIGHT POINT EIGHT, SO WE'RE DOWN SIX POINT SIX MILLION.

WHAT THAT RELATES TO IS PERMIT FEES BECAUSE THEY'RE ALL BASED ON CONSTRUCTION VALUE.

SO TOTAL WE'RE BUILDING, WE'RE DOWN ABOUT ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS WHERE WE WERE LAST YEAR AT THIS TIME, PROBABLY COULD HAVE BEEN MUCH WORSE THAN THAT.

IT ALWAYS SEEMS TO BE IN A CYCLE WITH BUILDING PERMITS UP ONE YEAR, DOWN ANOTHER YEAR.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE DO HAVE SOME NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMING ON LINE WHERE COPPER CREEK ON HASLET IN SILVER STONE ON POWELL BOTH OF THOSE THE DEVELOPER SAYING

[00:20:05]

THEY'RE GOING TO BE READY TO GET BUILDING PERMITS FOR NEW HOUSE CONSTRUCTION, PROBABLY RIGHT AFTER THE FIRST YEAR.

ONE THING JUST AN INTEREST IF YOU LOOK AT THESE FIGURES, OVERALL, THE COST FOR CONSTRUCTION HAS INCREASED AND WE DIDN'T LOSE ANY MONEY ON THE NEW SINGLE FAMILY STARTS THIS YEAR. WE'RE EVEN FROM WHERE WE WERE LAST YEAR, BUT WE'RE DOWN ON THE NUMBER OF PERMITS. LAST YEAR, THE AVERAGE COST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE WAS THREE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THOUSAND.

THIS YEAR, AVERAGING FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY THOUSAND ON AVERAGE FOR A NEW HOUSE START.

SO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT REPORT.

IT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHERE WE ARE, WHERE WE'VE BEEN AND WHERE WE'RE AT, BUT THOSE NUMBERS ARE MUCH CLOSER TOGETHER.

AND ALSO THE FORESIGHT OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM NOT TO FILL A PLANNING POSITION 10 MONTHS AGO WITH THIS DOWNTURN LOOKS LIKE A PRETTY GOOD DECISION AT THIS POINT.

GOING OVER TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT FOR A QUICK UPDATE, WATER SHUTOFFS AND REVENUE SHARING. DIRECTOR MATTISON.

AND GOOD AFTERNOON BOARD.

WHERE WE'RE AT ON WATER SHUTOFFS IS THE I BELIEVE THE HOUSE VOTED ON THURSDAY NINETY SIX TO SIX TO EXTEND THE SHUT OFF PERIOD TO THE END OF MARCH SO MARCH 31ST.

I BELIEVE THAT SHOULD BE ON THE GOVERNOR'S DESK VERY QUICKLY.

TRUSTEE OPSOMMER CAN, YOU KNOW, CHIME IN IF HE KNOWS ANYTHIN MORE ON THAT.

THOUGH, WE'LL FOLLOW THOSE PROTOCOLS AND WE WON'T DO ANY WATER SHUTOFFS THROUGH THE END OF MARCH. AND THEN ALSO WANTED TO TOUCH BASE A LITTLE BIT ON OUR STATE REVENUE SHARING.

AT THE BEGINNING OF ALL OF THIS PROCESS, WE THOUGHT THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE ABOUT A HALF MILLION DOLLARS SHORT ON OUR STATE REVENUE SHARING WITH THE CHANGES AND PURCHASES.

I THINK WE'RE GOING TO BE A LITTLE SHORT, MAYBE, MAYBE DOWN MAYBE 50 TO 1000 BASED ON THE LAST PAYMENT THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET.

BUT I THINK THE PICTURE LOOKS A LOT BETTER THAN WHAT WE HAD THOUGHT AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE COVID PROCESS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND TREASURER DESCHAINE DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? YES. BRIEFLY, THE SENATE SEVENTY FIVE DAYS FROM DECEMBER 1ST TO FEBRUARY 14TH ARE THE DAYS IN WHICH WE COLLECT ALL OF OUR TOWNSHIP REVENUE THAT GOES TO THE TOWNSHIP AND GOES TO EVERYONE BUT THE NON EDUCATION PEOPLE.

SO IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT THAT DESPITE THE LOCKDOWN, WE STAYED OPEN.

WE DID CREATE A NEW ENVELOPE FOR OUR RESIDENTS.

YOU CAN SEE IT HERE. IT SITS OUT AT THE CURB AND ALLOWS THEM TO PUT IN THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS AND ADDRESS SO THEY CAN DROP OFF A PAYMENT.

WE'LL EITHER ELECTRONICALLY SEND THEM A RECEIPT OR SEND THAT VIA US MAIL.

WE HAVE FOUND THAT OUR WALK IN TRAFFIC IS DOWN 95 PERCENT FROM LAST YEAR, AS WE HAD HOPED.

WE DO HAVE THE TOWN HALL OPEN.

THANK YOU TO STEPHEN AND OTHERS, DEREK AND THE CREW THAT SET UP A SAFE RECEPTION AREA OUT THERE WHERE WE RECEIVE PAYMENTS, UTILITY PAYMENTS AND TAX PAYMENTS.

BILLING DEPARTMENT ALSO MEETS WITH CONTRACTORS TO TAKE PERMITS.

SO WE'RE PRACTICING EVERY BIT OF SAFE PROTOCOL THAT WE CAN, AND IT'S WORKING.

OUR REVENUES ARE WHERE THEY SHOULD BE.

AND WE CONTINUE TO HAVE EXCEPTIONAL RESIDENTS WHO ARE WORKING WITH US, DROPPING OFF PAYMENTS OR MAILING THEM IN RATHER THAN BRINGING THEM IN PERSON.

IT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MR. SUPERVISOR, THAT'S KIND OF A COMBINED RESPONSE OR COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSE OF WHAT WE'RE DOING AS A COMMUNITY, AS A TEAM IN RESPONSE TO COVID.

WHAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING AND WHAT WE CONTINUE TO BE DOING.

AND I WOULD TURN IT BACK OVER TO YOU TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY QUESTION.

OK, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FIRST.

HAVE WE HAD ANY NON PUBLIC SAFETY EMPLOYEES THAT HAVE FACED ISSUES WITH THE COVID VIRUS? YES, WE HAVE. NUMBER WISE.

I WOULD SAY TWO OR THREE.

TWO OR THREE. OK.

ARE THEY RECOVERED OR WE'RE STILL HAVING THAT ISSUE? WE'RE IN GOOD SHAPE. OK.

[INAUDIBLE] PLEASE IF SOMEHOW THIS THING FALLS APART AND GOVERNOR DOESN'T SIGN IT, YOU KNOW, WE CAN ALWAYS INCLUDE THAT IN OUR EMERGENCY ORDER HERE FROM THE TOWNSHIP.

SO PLEASE KEEP ME IN THE LOOP ON THAT.

ANY BOARD MEMBERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR ISSUES THEY WANT TO RAISE? TRUSTEE OPSOMMER. YEAH, TO THE WATER POINT, I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO PROPOSE THAT WE JUST CONSIDER ACTING TODAY TO EXTEND THAT WATER SHUTOFF HERE THROUGH THE END OF JUNE.

YOU KNOW, TO PRETEND AS IF ON MARCH 31ST THERE ISN'T STILL GOING TO BE AN ACTIVE PANDEMIC IS RATHER SILLY. THE, YOU KNOW, THE OMA EXTENSION FOR VIRTUAL MEETINGS AND THE WATER SHUT

[00:25:07]

OFF WERE BOTH EXTENDED UNTIL MARCH THIRTY FIRST.

AND THAT JUST CONTINUES TO BE A TREND.

I MEAN, EVERY OTHER BOARD MEETING THAT WE MEET, WE TALK ABOUT HOW THE OMA IS ABOUT TO EXPIRE. SO THE LEGISLATURE IS CONTINUOUSLY BEING VERY CONSERVATIVE IN EXTENDING THESE ASSURANCES TO THE PUBLIC.

I THINK IT WOULD BE IN OUR INTEREST JUST TO SAY THROUGH, YOU KNOW, THE BEGINNING OF SUMMER WATER SHUTOFFS WOULD BE POSTPONED BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT MINIMALLY, EVEN IF WE ARE EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE IN IMPLEMENTING THE VACCINE AND GETTING THAT DISTRIBUTED AND TO PATIENTS, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, THE BEST CASE SCENARIO THAT WOULD BE MIDSUMMER FOR US TO REALLY HAVE AN IMPACT WITH THE VACCINE.

SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT I WOULD PROPOSE.

IF NOTHING ELSE, WE CAN ISSUE OUR SUPERVISOR WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD CAN ISSUE AN EMERGENCY ORDER THAT WOULD INCLUDE BOTH OF THOSE THINGS THROUGH THE END OF JUNE.

I DO THAT IN A JANUARY MEETINGS.

OK, THANK YOU.

MR. WALSH, DO YOU HAVE MORE FOR US HERE? NOT UNDER ITEM A, BUT WE DO UNDER ITEM B, SIR.

OK, LET'S MOVE ON TO B THEN.

[7B. Meridian Township Small Business Relief Fund]

OK, I WILL REITERATE TO YOU WHAT'S IN THE MEMO.

I READ IT, BUT WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING TODAY IS THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER ROUND TWO OF THE SMALL BUSINESS RELIEF PROGRAM THAT THE BOARD INITIATED SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.

THE CAUCUS AT THAT TIME WAS AROUND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND.

WE DID ABOUT THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND OR THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLAR GRANTS TO HELP SMALL BUSINESSES. IT WAS THE REQUIREMENTS TO APPLY FOR THAT WERE SOMEWHAT STRINGENT A FEW MONTHS AGO WAS PROPOSED DUE TODAY IS LESS STRINGENT.

THE NET WILL BE CAST MUCH FURTHER AND WIDER WITH THIS PROGRAM IF THE BOARD DECIDES TO GO FORWARD. ITS RECOMMENDATION THAT WE USE THE [INAUDIBLE] FUND, THERE'S CURRENTLY SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN THAT.

WE'RE RECOMMENDING WE USE FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF THAT TO MAKE A SIMILAR TO EXACTLY SIMILAR TO THE PROGRAM THAT WE DID.

IT WORKED REALLY WELL FOUR MONTHS AGO AND GO FORWARD WITH THE SAME FORMAT AND HAVE THE MONEY IN THE HANDS OF OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES WITHIN THREE TO FOUR WEEKS.

IF WE MOVE SWIFTLY, WE CAN GET IT DONE.

I WON'T GO OVER ALL THE OTHER TENETS YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU AND I KNOW YOU'RE WELL READ AND COME TO THE MEETINGS PREPARED.

SO I WOULD TURN IT BACK OVER TO YOU, MR. SUPERVISOR. MR. DIRECTOR CLARK, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DETAILS OF THE PROGRAM OR THE CONDITIONS THAT BOARD DIRECTOR CLARK WOULD BE THE ONE TO ADDRESS THOSE QUESTIONS TO.

THANK YOU. DIRECTOR CLARK, DO YOU WANT TO ADD BEFORE I LEFT A FOR QUESTIONS? JUST TO REITERATE WHAT MANAGER WALSH SAID, THAT WE REALLY WORKED TO MAKE THE ELIGIBILITY WINDOW OPEN FOR AS MANY BUSINESSES.

IT DOES MEAN THAT WE WILL RECEIVE A LOT OF APPLICATIONS, BUT THAT RESPONSIBILITY OF AWARD WILL GO TO THE COMMITTEE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY ESTABLISHED AND THEY'LL BE ABLE TO MAKE THE RIGHT CASE BY CASE DETERMINATION FOR AWARD.

I KNOW THAT PRELIMINARY TO TODAY, WE HAD A QUESTION AS TO WHY WE'RE CAPPING AT SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND WANTING TO ANSWER THAT.

YEAH, I JUST THINK IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT ALL THE BUSINESSES THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO APPLY FOR THIS, WE HAD FOUR THOUSAND.

THE ONES DOUBLED TO SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS.

WE THINK THAT'S A GOOD NUMBER BECAUSE IT ALLOWS US TO HELP OF MANY MORE BUSINESSES.

I THINK WHEN YOU GO UP TO TEN THOUSAND, WHAT IT DOES IS IT JUST IT GIVES EVERYONE THE IMPRESSION THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS.

AND IF YOU DO THAT, WE'RE REALLY GOING TO BE LIMITED ON THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES THAT WE CAN HELP. WE TALKED ABOUT INTERNALLY, WE THINK THAT SEVEN THOUSAND IS AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER TO GO WITH AT THIS TIME, BUT IT'S CERTAINLY OPEN AND FINAL DECISION RESTS WITH THE BOARD. YOU USE THAT NUMBER THAT TRANSLATE INTO IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU ESTIMATE, IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES WE WOULD BE ABLE TO ASSIST? WELL, THAT'S REALLY A VARIABLE.

THERE'S NO COMMON DENOMINATOR TO THAT, BECAUSE IF YOU WERE OBVIOUSLY NOT ALL BUSINESSES ARE GOING TO GET SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS, BUT IT WOULD BE, I THINK, SEVENTY ONE THOUSAND.

THAT'S WHAT I DID THE MATH.

BUT THERE PROBABLY WOULD PROBABLY THAT I WOULD SAY CLOSER TO NINETY OR NINETY FIVE BUSINESSES BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE A NUMBER OF THEM THAT GIVE THEM MUCH-- THERE'S A OBVIOUSLY A DIFFERENCE. AND I WON'T GO INTO-- THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RESTAURANT

[00:30:03]

THAT'S BEEN AROUND FOREVER AND HAS [INAUDIBLE] VERSUS A MUCH SMALLER OPERATION THAT'S NEW TO THE COMMUNITY. AND YOU CAN MAKE ALL THOSE COMPARISONS.

BUT MY GUESS IS THE MINIMUM AMOUNT, MR. SUPERVISOR, WILL BE SEVENTY ONE, BUT I WOULD THINK WOULD BE THE MID 90S FOR BUSINESSES, THE WAY I PROJECT IT.

AND JUST AS A REMINDER TO EVERYONE, HOW MANY DO WE HELP WITH OUR FIRST PHASE? [INAUDIBLE]. WE DID THIRTY SEVEN BUSINESSES AT FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS EACH.

AND THEN THE OTHER QUESTION THAT'S COME UP IN ADVANCE OF TODAY IS THE LIMIT OF 50 EMPLOYEES. IN FACT, I THINK YOU BROUGHT THIS UP YOURSELF TO THE BOARD.

HAVE YOU HAD MORE THOUGHTS ON THAT? YEAH, RECOLLECTION.

DIRECTOR CLARK AND I DISCUSSED ACTUALLY, SHE CAME DOWN TO TALK TO ME ABOUT THAT MAYBE ON MONDAY OR TUESDAY AND ON HER REFLECTION, THOUGHT THAT MAYBE WE SHOULD IF WE'RE GOING TO CAST THAT NET MAYBE IT'LL BE FURTHER THAN THAT [INAUDIBLE] EMPLOYMENTS OUGHT TO BE REMOVED AND IT SHOULD JUST BE OPEN TO ANY BUSINESS IN MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP OTHER THAN HOME OCCUPATIONS THAT CAN APPLY.

AND OBVIOUSLY, I THINK THE GROUP'S GOING TO LOOK AT A LARGE SUPERMARKET DIFFERENTLY THAN THEY'RE GOING TO LOOK AT A SMALL MOM AND POP RESTAURANT.

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT. IT'S OVER AND WE'RE NOT LIMITING THIS TO JUST TOTALLY HOMEGROWN BUSINESSES. IF YOU'RE A FRANCHISE OWNER, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU STILL QUALIFY.

ANYONE CAN APPLY. OK.

ALL RIGHT. OTHER BOARD MEMBERS? MR. OPSOMMER, YOU HAD YOUR HAND OUT A MINUTE AGO.

YES, THANK YOU, SUPERVISOR STYKA, AND THANK YOU, DIRECTOR CLARK AND MANAGER WALSH, I APPRECIATE THE EFFORT TO ORGANIZE THIS MEETING AFTER WE KIND OF BRIEFLY DISCUSSED THIS RELATIVE TO OUR FUND BALANCE AT THE LAST BOARD MEETING.

AND I APPRECIATE HOW THOROUGHLY THE PACKAGE HAS BEEN PREPARED WITH THE APPLICATION AND ALL OF THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.

I WOULD ALSO SUPPORT GETTING RID OF CRITERIA TWO, WITH THE 50 EMPLOYEE CAP, JUST SO WE GIVE EVERYBODY THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPLY.

AND I APPRECIATE THAT WE'VE CAST A WIDE NET IN TERMS OF FRANCHISEES AND SUPERVISOR STYKA REFERENCED THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT I RAISED.

WE'VE BEEN-- I'VE BEEN LOOKING AT THAT ISSUE IN MY DAY JOB.

FRANCHISES LIKE DOUGLAS J AND BIG D ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE PURE MICHIGAN RELIEF FUNDING, WHICH IS THE FUNDING THAT THE MEDC IS CURRENTLY TAKING APPLICATIONS ON.

AND THAT OPENED ON DECEMBER 15TH.

SO THREE DAYS AGO.

AND WE'RE TRYING TO FILL IN THOSE GAPS LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT.

SO BY CASTING A WIDE NET, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF BUSINESSES THAT ARE ONLY ELIGIBLE FOR OUR RELIEF FUNDING.

AND THIS WILL BE THEIR ONLY OPPORTUNITY TO EVEN APPLY, MUCH LESS BE AWARDED THOSE FUNDS.

I WAS THINKING ABOUT THAT.

WE MIGHT WANT TO INCREASE THAT CAP, BUT I APPRECIATE MANAGER WALSH'S EXPLANATION AND THE GOAL AND OBJECTIVE BEING TO GET CLOSER TO NINETY THOUSAND, NINETY BUSINESSES.

I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION AS IT RELATES TO OUR APPLICANT POOL FROM THE PREVIOUS TIME WE DID THIS. DID WE HAVE A NONPROFIT OR ANY NONPROFITS THAT DID APPLY? I KNOW THEY'RE ELIGIBLE.

YOU DID. YOU DID HAVE NONPROFITS APPLY AND WERE ELIGIBLE.

AND THEY DID RECEIVE A PORTION OF THE GRANT AS WELL AS A LEAP GRANT.

I BELIEVE THE [INAUDIBLE] LEARNING CENTER WAS AN APPLICANT AND AN AWARDEE.

OK, SO AND WE COULD ALWAYS HAVE, YOU KNOW, JUST AS WE TALK ABOUT THAT, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF BUSINESSES BEING ASSISTED AND THE TOTAL FUNDING THAT WE'VE APPROPRIATED OR PROPOSED TO APPROPRIATE HERE, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALWAYS POSSIBLE THAT WE COULD HAVE FOOD PANTRIES APPLY AND OUR TWO BIG FOOD PANTRIES HERE IN THE TOWNSHIP ARE DOING QUITE WELL WITH PRIVATE GIVING AND OTHER SUPPORT THAT HAVE COME IN.

BUT, YOU KNOW, THERE MIGHT ALWAYS BE A WILLINGNESS ON THE COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT WITH A LOW DOLLAR FIGURE, WHICH OBVIOUSLY BRINGS THE AVERAGE DOWN.

SO I JUST, YOU KNOW, IN PRESENTING A HYPOTHETICAL WHERE WE MIGHT AWARD FIVE HUNDRED OR A THOUSAND TO A BUSINESS OR A NONPROFIT THAT IS OTHERWISE DOING PRETTY WELL, YOU KNOW, SIMILAR TO MEALS ON WHEELS REQUESTING A ONE THOUSAND DOLLAR INCREASE.

SO JUST FOOD FOR THOUGHT, BUT THAT WOULD JUST PUSH US CLOSER TO SUPPORTING ONE HUNDRED BUSINESSES. THE ONLY THING THAT I SEE THAT I THINK SHOULD BE ADDED WOULD BE TWO QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICATION.

ONE TO THE EFFECT OF PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOUR BUSINESS HAS BEEN ADVERSELY IMPACTED BY THE

[00:35:01]

PANDEMIC. DIRECTOR CLARK, CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I DON'T SEE ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES. CORRECT.

AND WE DON'T HAVE THAT ALONG THE LINES.

BUT I THINK WE WERE THINKING BECAUSE OF THE RECENT BUSINESS SURVEY THAT WE SENT OUT, WHERE 80 PERCENT OF THE RESPONDENTS HAD REQUESTED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE OF SOME SORT AND A GOOD PORTION OF THEM BEING A PART OF OUR RESTAURANT, BAR, HOSPITALITY INDUSTRIES, WE FIGURED THAT THEY WERE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED AND THAT IF THEY COULDN'T EXACTLY EXPLAIN OR SHOW THE PROOF OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACT, THAT THAT MIGHT NARROW OUR PARAMETERS.

IT CAN BE INCLUDED. OK, I'M JUST THINKING IN TERMS OF THE COMMITTEE AND TRYING TO GAUGE THE NEED FOR ONE BUSINESS TO ANOTHER, YOU KNOW, TO EXPLAIN THEIR FINANCIAL POSITION AND HOW IT'S CHANGED MIGHT BE HELPFUL FOR THE COMMITTEE.

THE OTHER THING THAT CAME TO MIND BECAUSE WE ARE TRYING TO FILL IN GAPS WOULD BE A QUESTION TO THE EFFECT OF WHAT OTHER RELIEF FUNDING HAVE YOU RECEIVED? PLEASE DETAIL THE SOURCE DATE AND AMOUNT.

BECAUSE WE REALLY NEED TO KNOW WHAT SUPPORT THEY'VE RECEIVED AND OBVIOUSLY THERE'S BEEN ANY NUMBER, YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN PROBABLY A DOZEN DIFFERENT SOURCES THAT BUSINESS OWNERS HAVE PURSUED. SO I REALLY THINK THAT THOSE TWO QUESTIONS SHOULD BE INCLUDED.

I MEAN, WE'VE ALREADY HEARD FROM SOME OF OUR SMALL BUSINESSES JUST AD HOC, MAKING THEIR FINANCIAL CASE TO THE TOWNSHIP.

AND SO I THINK THEY NEED TO BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN THE SPECIFIC AND UNIQUE IMPACT THAT THEY'VE ENCOUNTERED.

THOSE WOULD BE MY ONLY TWO RECOMMENDATIONS, INCLUDING THAT ON THE APPLICATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMITTEE AND MAKING PRUDENT DECISIONS IN AWARDING THE GRANTS AND THE AMOUNT TO BE AWARDED.

BEFORE WE GO ON TO OTHER THINGS, LET'S HAVE ANY INPUT BY OTHER BOARD MEMBERS WITH REGARD TO THE TWO POINTS RAISED BY TRUSTEE OPSOMMER? TREASURER DESCHAINE. I ACTUALLY LIKE ADDING BOTH THOSE QUESTIONS.

I THINK THEY IMPROVE THE APPLICATION AND GIVE US GOOD INFORMATION AS TO WHY PEOPLE ARE ASKING FOR AND WHAT OTHER HELP THEY'RE GETTING THAT ARE HELPING THEM.

A THIRD QUESTION COULD BE, HOW WILL THIS KEEP YOU IN BUSINESS? BUT THAT'S A TOUGHER ONE TO DEFINE.

BUT I THINK THE MORE INFORMATION WE HAVE FROM THESE APPLICANTS, THE BETTER WE'RE GOING TO BE AND BETTER ABLE WE'RE ABLE, BETTER ABLE WE ARE TO ASSERT, ASCERTAIN, RATHER, SHOULD THEY GET TWO THOUSAND OR FIVE THOUSAND OR SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS.

WE DON'T KNOW THAT ANSWER RIGHT OFF THE BAT.

IT'S NOT A FIXED AMOUNT.

THEY'RE VARIABLE AMOUNT. AND THESE QUESTIONS CAN HELP US DETERMINE WHICH-- HOW MUCH TO AWARD THE APPLICANTS.

AND WE'LL GET TO THAT THIRD QUESTION YOU'RE RECOMMENDING AFTER WE FINISH THE FIRST TWO.

TRUSTEE WISINSKI. I WOULD ALSO SUPPORT BOTH OF THOSE QUESTIONS AND I KIND OF TO WHAT THE TREASURER SAID, THAT I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A BETTER WAY TO JUSTIFY THE CHOICES BECAUSE I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF BUSINESSES THAT ARE GOING TO APPLY FOR THIS AS THIS PANDEMIC CONTINUES.

SO THE MORE INFORMATION WE CAN HAVE SO THAT WE CAN JUSTIFY WHO AND HOW MUCH I THINK WOULD BE REALLY HELPFUL.

ANYONE ELSE FROM THE [INAUDIBLE] RECOMMENDED BY TRUSTEE OPSOMMER.

TRUSTEE JACKSON. YES, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT IN MANY OF THE EARLIER EFFORTS TO SUPPORT BUSINESSES, THE USES PROPOSED USES WERE LIMITED TO SUPPORTING EMPLOYEES AND THINGS LIKE RENT AND UTILITIES.

ARE WE IN LIBERALIZING THIS EFFORT, REMOVING THOSE KINDS OF RESTRICTIONS OR OTHERWISE, DISCOUNTING THOSE LIMITS AS A PART OF OUR EFFORT? THEY CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE QUESTION.

BUT RIGHT NOW, IT'S A VERY GENERAL, VERY LIBERAL ASK.

AND IN THAT CASE, I CAN SUPPORT THAT THE TWO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS THAT ARE ADDED, WHICH WE PUT IN TO SOME EXTENT, ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES.

ANYONE ELSE ON THOSE TWO QUESTIONS THAT THOSE TWO QUESTIONS? OK, I THINK WE GOT CONSENSUS TO ADD THEM.

THE THIRD QUESTION THAT WAS RECOMMENDED BY TREASURER IS THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF ONE OF THOSE.

WANT TO REPEAT THAT THIRD ONE THERE, MR.

[00:40:01]

DESCHAINE? BEING OPEN ENDED QUESTION TO ASK, HOW WILL THIS GRANT HELP YOU TO STAY OPEN INTO 2021? OK, IS THERE A DISCUSSION ON THIS? THIS IS SOMETHING WE WANT TO ADD TO THIS APPLICATION? IS THERE A REASON NOT TO? LET'S PUT IT THAT WAY.

TRUSTEE WISINSKI.

I WOULD SAY THAT THAT QUESTION WOULD GET TO TRUSTEE JACKSON WAS WAS QUESTIONING, IT WOULD ALLOW AGAIN FOR JUSTIFICATION.

WHAT DO YOU PLAN TO USE THIS FOR? DO YOU PLAN TO USE IT TO RETAIN EMPLOYEES OR TO ENSURE THAT THE BUILDINGS CAN STAY OPEN VERSUS NEW APPLIANCES OR SOMETHING? I THINK IT WOULD ALLOW US, AGAIN, TO HELP JUSTIFY HOW MUCH WHO AND WHO GETS WHAT.

GOOD POINTS.

EVERYONE ELSE? SO IT FEELS THAT WE SHOULD NOT BE ASKING-- BEFORE I GET JUST TRUSTEE OPSOMMER, YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP. YEAH, I'M JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WAS UNIQUE WITH OUR FIRST ROUND OF GRANTS WAS THAT THAT WAS COMPLETELY OPEN ENDED TO TRUSTEE JACKSON'S POINT. BUSINESSES WERE NOT CONSTRAINED IN HOW THEY USED IT, BECAUSE WE DID HAVE RESTAURANTS THAT WERE COMPLAINING THAT THE PPP, THE PAYROLL PROGRAM, SOME OF THEM, YOU KNOW, YOU HAD SMALL RESTAURANTS GETTING EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS AND PPP FUNDING THROUGH THEIR BANK OR THEIR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, BUT THEY DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH DEMAND TO PREPARE THAT FOOD AND TO SELL THAT FOOD TO ACTUALLY HIRE THOSE EMPLOYEES.

SO SOME BUSINESSES CHOSE TO ESSENTIALLY PAY PEOPLE AND THERE WAS NO FUNCTION FOR THEM TO PERFORM IN TERMS OF THE GOODS OR SERVICES THAT THAT RESTAURANT IS PERFORMING.

WHEREAS OTHERS JUST SAID, I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THIS BECAUSE I'M NOT GOING TO HIRE PEOPLE JUST TO SIT THERE.

I THINK PERHAPS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WAS THINKING, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP PEOPLE EMPLOYED TO REDUCE THE BURDEN ON AN UNEMPLOYMENT SYSTEM, BUT IT DIDN'T HELP THE BUSINESSES KEEP THEIR DOORS OPEN.

I JUST DON'T-- I'M JUST WONDERING IF THERE'S A WAY TO AND I DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC SUGGESTION JUST TO PREFACE THAT QUESTION SO THAT BUSINESSES DON'T FEEL, YOU KNOW, A PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE ON HOW THEY ANSWER THAT.

BECAUSE SOME MIGHT THINK THAT THE TOWNSHIPS INTENT IS THAT WE WANT THEM TO HOLD ON TO THEIR EMPLOYEES WHEN IT'S NOT PRACTICAL FOR SOME INDUSTRIES LIKE RESTAURANTS, YOU KNOW.

THERE ARE SOME THAT RIGHT NOW, I MEAN, THEY CAN OPERATE WITH ONE OR TWO PEOPLE.

THE COOK IS LITERALLY THE ONE TAKING THE FOOD CURBSIDE.

AND LIKE SADDLEBACK BARBEQUE, AT LEAST FOR A TIME, I DON'T KNOW IF THEY JUST TURN THEIR PHONES OFF, BASICALLY, OR AT LEAST THEY TURN THE PHONES OFF LITERALLY.

BUT THEY ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO SUBMIT ORDERS ONLINE BECAUSE THEY JUST HAVE THE ONE PERSON.

SO ONLINE ORDERS WOULD COME IN, THE COOK WOULD PREPARE IT AND LITERALLY TAKE IT OUT TO YOUR CAR. SO JUST SOME WAY TO MASSAGE IT AND DIRECTOR CLARK COULD HANDLE IT.

I SUPPORT THE QUESTION.

I JUST DON'T WANT BUSINESSES TO OVERTHINK IT BECAUSE THOSE THAT ARE MOST THE HARDEST HIT, YOU KNOW, ARE GOING TO LOOK AT THAT.

AND REALLY THEY HAVE TO OFFSET THEIR LOSSES.

LIKE IF YOU'RE OPERATING SEVERELY IN THE RED, THAT'S AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER.

IF YOU'VE LOST FIFTY ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS SINCE THE PANDEMIC'S STARTED IN YOUR SAVINGS FROM THE BUSINESS AND ARE NEARING THE POINT WHERE YOU'D HAVE TO TAKE OUT CREDIT LOANS THAT YOU MAY OR MAY NOT BE ABLE TO GET JUST TO CONTINUE OPERATING, THAT'S AN ACCEPTABLE ANSWER. SO JUST SOME WAY TO MASSAGE THAT.

BUT I DO SUPPORT THE QUESTION.

WELL, IN LIGHT OF THOSE COMMENTS, I'M WONDERING IF THIS QUESTION REALLY MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT OF A DETRIMENT.

M.S GUTHRIE, YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP.

I CONCUR.

I MEAN, I THINK A GENERAL QUESTION IN GENERAL, HOW DO YOU INTEND TO USE THESE FUNDS TO ASSIST YOUR BUSINESS LOSS IS SOMETHING IN GENERAL THAT DOESN'T PUT A LOT OF PRESSURE ON A BUSINESS THAT JUST, YOU KNOW, AND THINK THAT'S AN EASY QUESTION TO ASK.

AND I DON'T THINK IT'S OUTRAGEOUS FOR THE TOWNSHIP TO ASK A GENERAL QUESTION LIKE THAT IN ASSISTING BUSINESSES.

AND I THINK THESE BUSINESSES KNOW THAT WE DO WANT TO ASSIST THEM AND HELP THEM AS BEST THAT WE CAN. BUT YOU'RE SUGGESTING IF WE HAD THE PHRASE AT THE BEGINNING IN GENERAL, HOW DO YOU IT'D BE BETTER TO ASK YOU FOR DETAIL? YEAH, I DO.

AND IT'S NOT THAT IT'S NOT CONTINGENT UPON THEM GETTING THE MONEY, IT'S JUST HOW, YOU KNOW, SHARE WITH US HOW YOU'RE GOING TO USE THIS TO ASSIST YOUR BUSINESS.

[00:45:03]

YEAH, THE IDEA IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A TOOL TO HELP US IF WE END UP WITH 150 APPLICANTS WE'VE GOT TO GET IT DOWN TO 90.

HOW DO WE PAIR THEM DOWN? WE NEED TO TELL THEM THAT IT'S JUST TO DISCOURAGE THEM FROM APPLYING IN THE FIRST PLACE.

ALL RIGHT. ANYWAY, SO THAT SOUNDS LIKE IF WE WORD IT IN A GENERAL WAY LIKE THAT, IT WOULD BE A THIRD ADDITIONAL QUESTION, MS. CLARK. OK, I HAVE IT SET AS PLEASE SHARE IN GENERAL, HOW YOU PLAN TO UTILIZE THE AWARDED FUNDING. YOUR RESPONSE WILL NOT AFFECT THE AWARD DETERMINATION.

I DON'T KNOW IF I WANT TO ADD THAT LAST PHRASE.

IT COULD. I THINK I LEAVE IT OPEN WITHOUT THAT LAST PHRASE.

THE LAST PHRASE THAT AN AD HOC IDEA.

BUT THAT LAST PHRASE COULD JUST BE AMENDED TO SAY, YOU KNOW, OFFSETTING BUSINESS LOSSES DOES NOT DEEM BUSINESSES INELIGIBLE.

OR MAYBE WE JUST DON'T FEEL THAT WE'RE NOT.

IT WILL ALWAYS GOING TO FAR, WHICH TEND TO BECOME SO TECHNICAL THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE WORRIED ABOUT WHAT THEY SAID.

WE NEED TO MAKE IT CLEAR WE'RE NOT FORCING PEOPLE TO HAVE ACTIVE PAYROLL THAT THEIR BUSINESS HAS NO DEMAND FOR.

AND THOSE ARE THE BUSINESSES MOST LIKELY TO GO UNDER.

UNFORTUNATELY, IT'S LIKE A DOUBLE EDGED SWORD.

ALL RIGHT, WE'LL LEAVE IT TO MR. WALSH AND MS. CLARK TO FIGURE THAT OUT.

ANYTHING ELSE? YES, TREASURER.

I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT ONE THING ABOUT THESE GRANTS I LIKE MORE THAN THE FIRST ROUND IS THAT WE'RE NOT REQUIRING THE OWNER TO LIVE IN MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP.

WE HAD SOME PRETTY STRICT LIMITATIONS BEFORE AND WE HAD REASONS FOR IT, FOR PASSING IT THAT WAY. BUT THIS IS BETTER THAT WE ARE SUPPORTING LOCAL BUSINESSES.

OUR BUSINESS IN THE TOWNSHIP, THEY COULD LIVE IN BARTHE TOWNSHIP OR EAST LANSING OR PASADENA, CALIFORNIA.

BUT IF THERE ARE LOCAL BUSINESS, THAT'S WHAT WE CARE ABOUT SUPPORTING.

SO I THINK REMOVING THAT RESTRICTION WAS A VERY GOOD IDEA.

I COULD BE WRONG. I THINK WHAT WE SAID WAS THEY HAD TO BE AT MERIDIEN BOARD RATHER THAN LIVE IN MERIDIAN. BUT, YEAH, IT'S STILL AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION.

AND WHILE I HAVE THE FLOOR, I APPRECIATE THE COMMITTEE FROM BEFORE COMING BACK, INCLUDING YOU, TRUSTEE JACKSON, SUPERVISOR STYKA.

BUT DO WE WANT TO HAVE THIS? THE TECHNICAL DECISION IS NOT A POLITICAL DECISION.

AND WHILE YOUR INPUT IS VALUABLE FOR THE SAME REASON WE DON'T INVOLVE MORE MEMBERS IN OUR DECISION AS TO WHICH ROADS GET FIXED EVERY YEAR.

DO WE WANT TO HAVE BOARD MEMBERS INVOLVED IN THIS DECISION MAKING? JUST WANT TO THROW IT OUT THERE.

I DON'T MEAN TO DEMEAN FROM YOUR INPUT.

I THINK IT'S A THIS IS A TECHNICAL DECISION THAT WE WANT TO MAKE.

AND AS MUCH AS WE CAN PASS IT ON THE STAFF, I THINK IT'S STRONGER FOR THE BOARD.

IT'S A GOOD, EXCELLENT QUESTION TO RAISE AND GOOD POINT.

OTHER BOARD MEMBERS, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT? JUST ABOUT EVERYBODY FEEL.

COURTNEY.

JUST SAY I SUPPORT I WOULD SUPPORT THAT.

DAN YOU HAD YOUR HAND? YEAH, I'M FINE EITHER WAY.

I DO THINK HAVING DIVERSE REPRESENTATION, THOUGH, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A BOARD MEMBER OFF, MAYBE PUT SOMEONE ELSE ON THERE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE HEARING FROM BUSINESSES IN THE COMMUNITY, IT HELPS TO HAVE MORE EYES THAN FEWER ON THE APPLICATIONS.

I MEAN, ASK MANAGER WALSH IF WE DON'T HAVE A COUPLE OF BOARD MEMBERS ON HIS COMMITTEE, HOW WOULD YOU RECAST THE COMMITTEE? I HAVEN'T GIVEN THAT ANY THOUGHT.

I'D PROBABLY GO BACK TO THE BOARD AND SAY, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? I WILL TELL YOU THIS, THAT I UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE THE QUESTION FROM THE TREASURER.

AND THERE'S A LOT OF MERIT TO IT.

I WILL TELL YOU THAT WE HAD A VERY, VERY ROBUST DISCUSSION WITH THE MEMBERSHIP THAT WE HAD, AND IT WENT EXTREMELY WELL AND THERE WAS NO POLITICS.

AND I FELT FREE IS SITTING THERE AND I WORK FOR TWO OF THE PEOPLE AT THE TABLE.

I FELT VERY FREE AND UNBRIDLED TO SHARE MY OWN THOUGHTS.

AND I DISAGREED MANY TIMES WITH THE TWO BOARD MEMBERS AND WE JUST SIMPLY TOOK VOTES.

IT'S REALLY UP TO YOU, BUT THE PROCESS WORKED EXTREMELY WELL LAST TIME.

BUT I UNDERSTAND THE THOUGHT OF SHOULD WE MIRROR THIS TO THE ROADS? I UNDERSTAND THAT.

AND SO REALLY IT'S YOUR DECISION.

BUT IF YOU DECIDE NOT TO HAVE ANY BOARD MEMBERS, I WOULD COME BACK TO YOU WITH SOME SUGGESTIONS ON HOW WE FILL THOSE OTHER COUPLE OF SEATS.

I SAID WHAT I WAS ASKING, YOU KNOW, ON THE CHANCE THAT WE DECIDE TO IMPLEMENT THIS WITH A

[00:50:02]

VOTE TODAY, WHAT YOUR THOUGHTS WOULD BE IN TERMS OF FILLING THOSE SEATS IF WE CHOSE TO GO THAT ROUTE? I PROBABLY AND PERHAPS [INAUDIBLE] PROBABLY WOULD.

AND, YOU KNOW, YOU START TO INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY.

YOU'VE GOT THE SAME ISSUE.

YOU CAN HAVE COMMUNITY MEMBERS, BUT THEY HAVE TIES.

THEY KNOW PEOPLE. AND WHAT I PROBABLY DO IS MAYBE AT A POSITION LIKE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR, MAYBE THE DEPUTY MANAGER, MAYBE SOMEBODY IN DEVELOPMENT, THAT SORT OF THING THAT DEALS WITH BUSINESSES.

OR MR. MENSER MIGHT BE ADDED.

BUT I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO THINK THAT THERE WAS AND I KNOW WE'RE I'M SUGGESTING THIS AND I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR FROM SOMEONE WHO SAT AT THE TABLE, EVEN THOUGH WE HAD SIX FOLKS IN THERE AND TWO ELECTED OFFICIALS, TWO OF THE SIX WERE ELECTED OFFICIALS.

IT WAS A VERY, VERY NON POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT THAT WE WORKED THROUGH.

SO IF YOU DECIDE AFTER THIS MEETING THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE BOARD MEMBERS, I SIMPLY WILL GO BACK AND FIGURE OUT THE TWO ADDITIONAL FOLKS FROM INTERNALLY HERE AND THEN REPORT BACK TO YOU. WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO, MR. SUPERVISOR. CLERK GUTHRIE. I WOULD SUPPORT TAKING THE BOARD MEMBERS OFF AND TRUSTING IN THE MANAGER TO MAKE THOSE APPOINTMENTS.

IF WE WERE TO DO THAT.

THAT'S THE QUESTION, ARE WE GOING TO WHICH WAY DO WE WANT TO GO? YOU SOUND LIKE YOU SUPPORT GOING IN THAT DIRECTION.

YES, I WOULD SUPPORT GOING IN THAT DIRECTION.

YES. TREASURER.

I WANT TO SAY TO BEGIN WITH, I DON'T BELIEVE THE FIRST ROUND, THE FIRST PROCESS WE HAD WAS INFLUENCED POLITICALLY IN ANY WAY, AND THAT'S WHY I WAS A BIT HESITANT TO EVEN BRING THIS UP, BECAUSE I THINK IT WAS A FAIR PROCESS FROM EVERYTHING I'VE HEARD OF THOSE DISCUSSIONS. I THINK THAT IT PUTS YOU AND TRUSTEE JACKSON IN A DIFFICULT POSITION OR COULD IN THE FUTURE IF THAT ACCESS WAS EVER MADE.

AND WHAT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME IS THERE'S MORE MONEY INVOLVED.

WE'RE DEALING WITH THREE TIMES AS MUCH MONEY AND PROBABLY A LOT MORE GRANTS.

AND SO THAT'S THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY THAT SOMEONE WHO DIDN'T GET FUNDED MIGHT COME BACK AND LEVEL SUCH A CHARGE. I DON'T WANT TO PUT YOU TWO VOLUNTEERING YOUR TIME AND EXPERTISE AND THEN ONLY HAVE THAT COME BACK LATER AND BE USED AGAINST YOU.

THAT WOULD BE HIGHLY UNFAIR.

SO THAT'S THE REASON I BRING IT UP.

LET'S MAKE SURE WE DON'T PUT YOU A SUPERVISOR AND TRUSTEE IN DIFFICULT POSITION HERE MOVING FORWARD. AND I RECEIVED ABSOLUTELY NO NEGATIVE COMMENTS FROM ANYBODY.

I DON'T KNOW ABOUT MS. JACKSON.

I DID NOT.

I WAS ACTUALLY IMPRESSED BY THE LACK OF POLITICAL THINKING AT ALL IN THE VALUATION OF THE APPLICATIONS AND THE DECISIONS MADE.

I THINKING AT THIS POINT THAT I WILL VOTE AGAINST THE SUGGESTION BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S NECESSARY, BUT IN GENERAL, I DON'T FEEL VERY STRONGLY ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

I DON'T THINK I'M BEING DENIED AN OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS.

BOARD MEMBERS, AT THIS POINT, I'M NOT SURE WE HAVE A CONSENSUS.

WE HAVE A COUPLE OF PEOPLE THAT THOUGHT WE SHOULD CHANGE IT.

ONE WHO FELT GOOD EITHER WAY, ANOTHER ONE WHO FEELS MAYBE NOT.

I WOULD HONESTLY CONCUR WITH JUST TRUSTEE JACKSON IF I'M BEING HONEST.

I DON'T FEEL STRONGLY ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S-- I DO THINK WE, YOU KNOW, RECEIVE INPUT AND SENTIMENT FROM THE COMMUNITY ON HARDSHIP.

AND SO I THINK IT'S PART OF THE DUTIES TO BRING, YOU KNOW, THE INPUT AND WHATNOT THAT WE RECEIVE FROM THE COMMUNITY TO THE TABLE.

I'M OPEN TO WHATEVER. OH, YEAH.

I GUESS AS I THINK MORE ABOUT THIS.

I APPRECIATE THE QUESTION.

IT'S A REALLY GOOD ONE.

THERE IS A MIRROR INTO THE ROAD TO THE LOCAL ROAD PROGRAM.

BUT WHEN I LOOK AT THIS, I THINK TO MYSELF, YOU'RE ENTRUSTED AND VOTED ON, ELECTED TO SPEND 40 MILLION DOLLARS IN THE BUDGET.

AND YOU'RE ENTRUSTED TODAY OR THE FUTURE ABOUT WHETHER WE'RE GOING TO SPEND HALF A MILLION DOLLARS. THE BUCK STOPS WITH YOU.

YOU DECIDE THAT.

YOU KNOW THAT'S THE CASE, AND THAT'S WHAT THE VOTERS ENTRUST YOU TO DO.

MAYBE YOU'RE ENTRUSTED TO DECIDE WHERE SOME OF THE FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS GOES TO.

I REALLY I GUESS THAT'S WHERE I COME DOWN ON IT.

YOU'RE ENTRUSTED TO DO THAT AND--.

[00:55:02]

HAVING HEARD THE MANAGER JUST SAID AND TRUSTEE JACKSON, IF MY IDEA WAS THOUGHT OF AS A MOTION, I WANT TO WITHDRAW THAT AND I WANTED TO RAISE THE ISSUE.

I THINK WE'VE ADDRESSED THE ISSUE.

AND SO I DON'T THINK WE NEED A VOTE BECAUSE I HAVEN'T MADE A MOTION PER SAY ON THAT.

SO I'M GLAD WE DISCUSS IT.

BUT I RESPECT WHAT THE MANAGER JUST SAID IS RIGHT.

WE SPENT A LOT MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN OUR BUDGET EVERY YEAR.

AND AS LONG AS THE TRUSTEE JACKSON AND SUPERVISOR STYKA ARE OK SERVING ON IT AND CONFIDENT THE PROCESS WILL BE REPEATED AS THE FIRST TIME.

AND THEN I WITHDRAW THAT MOTION, IF YOU WILL, TO REMOVE BOARD MEMBERS FROM THIS REVIEW COMMITTEE. HEY, YEAH, I WASN'T BEING TREATED AS A MOTION, JUST AS A DISCUSSION ITEM, BUT I APPRECIATE THOSE COMMENTS.

ALL RIGHT, IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE A NEW CONSENSUS.

AS I WATCHED THE CLERK SHAKE HER HEAD.

[LAUGHTER] WELL, I APPRECIATE TREASURER DESCHAINE BRINGING THAT OUT BECAUSE THERE COULD BE PEOPLE WHO WOULD POSSIBLY VIEW IT IN THE WAY IN WHICH YOU WERE DESCRIBING.

AND SO I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT UP AND I APPRECIATE THE DISCUSSION AND I UNDERSTAND THE QUANDARY THAT SOMEONE COULD FEEL IF THEY WERE IN THAT POSITION.

SO I APPRECIATE THE DISCUSSION ON THAT.

[INAUDIBLE] BOARD MEMBERS, YOU KNOW, SHOULD COMMUNICATE IF IT'S MYSELF WITH TRUSTEE JACKSON, THE OTHER BOARD MEMBERS COULD CERTAINLY BE COMMUNICATED TO IT'S WHAT THEY'RE HEARING, YOU KNOW, WHAT BUSINESSES ARE SUFFERING, THAT THEY'VE GOTTEN INFORMATION FROM, ET CETERA. ANYTHING ELSE, MR. WALSH? JUST ONE SUGGESTION.

I WAS DEALING WITH AN ISSUE OUT IN THE HALL, AND I'M NOT SURE IF I MISSED SOMETHING, BUT ONE THING THAT COULD HAPPEN TOO AND MAYBE, MR. SUPERVISOR, YOU JUST MENTIONED THIS, BUT WE COULD PROVIDE THE BOARD MEMBERS WITH ALL THE COPIES OF ALL THE APPLICATIONS.

AND IF THEY HAVE SOME THOUGHTS, OPINIONS, YOU'RE ALL ELECTED TO DO THIS, RIGHT? SO IF YOU HAVE THOUGHTS ABOUT THOSE, YOU SHOULD TRANSLATE THOSE THOUGHTS TO YOUR BOARD MEMBERS WHO SERVE ON THERE SO THEY CAN CONVEY WHERE YOU'RE AT.

I BE CONCERNED ABOUT IN OPEN MEETINGS ACT VIOLATION IF WE DID THAT.

OK. IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE MAKING A DECISION WITHOUT BEING IN MEETING.

[INAUDIBLE] ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS COMMUNICATING BASED I MEAN, INFORMAL COMMUNICATIONS IS ONE THING, BUT THAT SOUNDS LIKE TOO FORMAL PROCESS AND I'D BE WORRIED ABOUT THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT. NOT TO SAY THAT THEY SHOULDN'T RECEIVE THE APPLICATIONS.

AND CERTAINLY MY PHONE IS HERE AND MY COMPUTER'S HERE.

I'M READY TO HEAR FROM PEOPLE.

TREASURER.

QUESTION FOR DIRECTOR CLARK.

WHAT OUTREACH, WHAT DO YOU PLAN TO USE TO INFORM LOCAL BUSINESSES OF THESE GRANTS? SOME WILL HEAR ABOUT IT THROUGH THE MEDIA.

SOME WILL HEAR ABOUT IT THROUGH [INAUDIBLE] OR MEDC, BUT OTHERS WON'T.

THOSE ARE THE ONES I'M MORE CONCERNED ABOUT US REACHING OUT TO.

SO OUR LAST ROUND OF GRANTS, WE KEPT A DIRECTORY.

SO THOSE WILL BE THE FIRST AND THEY'LL BE A DIRECT EMAIL BLASTS OR PHONE CALLS.

BUT I CAN'T CALL TWO HUNDRED BUSINESSES, ALL OF THEM IN A WEEK.

BUT I DO HAVE A PREPARED EMAIL BLAST THAT WILL GO TO THOSE GRANT AWARDS FROM THE LAST ROUND OR PARTICIPANTS ON THE LAST ROUND, WHETHER OR NOT THEY WERE AWARDED.

IF THEY APPLIED TO THE LAST TIME THAT THEY WILL GET AND GIVE US AN EXPLANATION AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE APPLICATION AND THEN SHARING IT WITH OUR REGIONAL PARTNERS.

I GAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN UPDATE TO OUR AREA PARTNERS AND OUR REGIONAL PARTNERS THIS WEEK. SO I TOLD EVERYBODY TO WATCH OUT FOR IT.

AND THEN SOCIAL MEDIA BLAST.

SO WE DO HAVE A STRATEGY ALREADY PREPARED.

TRUSTEE WISINSKI.

SUPERVISOR, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, IF IT'S APPROPRIATE TO MAKE A MOTION TO STRIKE NUMBER TWO FROM THE BUSINESS ELIGIBILITY [INAUDIBLE].

OK, RIGHT NOW WE'RE IN DISCUSSION MODE ONLY.

SO IF WE'RE GOING TO IF WE WOULD HAVE TO BE MOVING TO ADOPT THIS TODAY, WE WOULD HAVE TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND MOVE IN THAT DIRECTION.

IS THAT WHAT YOU WANT TO DO? I'M WILLING TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND MAKE A MOTION TODAY.

MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES SO WE COULD ACT ON THIS TODAY.

IS THEIR A SECOND? SECOND. WHAT ABOUT MR. OPSOMMER? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE OR RAISE THEIR HAND ON THIS.

I SEE ALL SIX BOARD MEMBERS WITH HANDS IN FRONT OF THEIR FACE.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

NOW GO AHEAD, MS. WISINSKI. I MOVE TO STRIKE THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA NUMBER TWO, THAT REQUIRES BUSINESSES

[01:00:06]

THAT HAVE EMPLOYEES 50 OR FEWER.

AND I ALSO MOVED TO ADD THE THREE QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICATION THAT WERE WITH RESPECT TO IMPACT OTHER FUNDS RECEIVED AND HOW THEY WOULD USE THE FUNDING.

SUPPORT. I'LL SUPPORT THAT.

SUPPORT WAS THAT MR. OPSOMMER FIRST? JACKSON.

JACKSON. OK, SORRY.

ALRIGHTY.

DISCUSSION ON THIS? I THINK WE GOT PRETTY DISCUSSED.

MS. JACKSON YOU HAVE SOME MORE.

YES.

I WOULD ONLY ADD THAT MAYBE DIRECTOR CLARK MIGHT NEED TO CHANGE HER METHODS OF GETTING THE WORD OUT, CONSIDERING THAT WE'RE CHANGING THE CRITERIA FOR APPLICANTS, INCLUDING THE INCLUSION OF A FRANCHISE OPERATIONS IN THE TOWNSHIP AND SO SHE MAY NEED TO FIND OTHER WAYS TO GET THE WORD OUT THAT THIS OPPORTUNITY WILL BE AVAILABLE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT [INAUDIBLE] HER OFFICE, BUT SEEMS TO BE FROM PAST THERE, THERE WAS AT LEAST SOME SORT OF LONG LIST OF BUSINESSES IN THE TOWNSHIP THAT HER DIRECTORS HAD ACCESS TO.

I BELIEVE [INAUDIBLE]. OH, YES, THERE IS A RUNNING LIST OF SOME BUSINESSES, AND SO WE'LL DO OUR BEST FOR CONTACT INFORMATION AS FAR AS THE ENTIRE MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP, AND I CAN TALK TO YOUR COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT ABOUT OTHER OPTIONS FOR ALL RIGHT, TRUSTEE OPSOMMER.

I DIDN'T CATCH EVERYTHING THAT DIRECTOR CLARK SHARED, BUT CERTAINLY REACHING OUT TO THE CHAMBER, TIM [INAUDIBLE], STEVE [INAUDIBLE], THEY COULD PUT IT OUT TO THEIR LIST.

AND MR. [INAUDIBLE] AND COULD PUT IT OUT TO THEIR LIST AND, YOU KNOW, NETWORKING THE OTHER PEOPLE WITH DIRECTORIES.

YES, TREASURER.

APPRECIATE TRUSTEE JACKSON COMMENT.

THIS IS A LARGER UNIVERSE WE'RE REACHING OUT TO HERE AND WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE LET THAT BE KNOWN AND THERE'S MORE MONEY INVOLVED AND WE'RE TRYING TO REACH MORE BUSINESSES.

IT WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE A CART BEFORE THE HORSE, IN A SENSE, WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO CHANGE SOME THINGS, BUT WITHOUT HAVING ACTUALLY MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT SOMETHING.

BY THE OTHER HAND, THE MOTION TO ADOPT IS RATHER BROAD.

SO LET'S HAVE A VOTE ON THE CHANGES THAT MS. WISINSKI HAS MADE OUR MOTION TO MAKE, WHICH IS THE DROPPING OF NUMBER TWO AND THE ELIGIBILITY AND ADDING THE THREE QUESTIONS.

IS THAT RIGHT, MS. WISINSKI? CORRECT. OK, MS. GUTHRIE, YOU WANT TO GET A VOTE ON THAT? TREASURER DESCHAINE.

YES. TRUSTEE JACKSON.

YES. TRUSTEE OPSOMMER.

YES. TRUSTEE SUNDLAND.

TRUSTEE WISINSKI.

YES. SUPERVISOR STYKA.

YES. AND THE CLERK VOTES YES.

MOTION CARRIES, SIX ZERO. OK, SO WE WOULD NEED A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE USE OF THE FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OF THE MERIDIAN DEVELOPMENT FUND TO GET THE MONEY INTO SMALL BUSINESS RELIEF PROGRAM AND RELEASE THE GRANT APPLICATION ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 21, DECEMBER TWENTY ONE TWENTY TWENTY.

AS THOSE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN AMENDED AT THIS MEETING.

MR. OPSOMMER.

SO MOVED.

SUPPORTED BY MS. JACKSON. OK.

ANY DISCUSSION OF THE WHOLE MATTER? WE COULD STILL MAKE SOME MORE CHANGES IF YOU WANT.

YES, MS. GUTHRIE.

I JUST HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS.

IF YOU REMOVE THE 50 REQUIREMENT IS MAYBE I MISSED THIS IS THEIR CAP OR NOT A CAP, IT'S JUST REMOVING A 50? IT'S JUST A CLARIFYING QUESTION.

THERE WAS NO CAP.

OK, AND THEN IS THERE A SEPARATE CRITERIA FOR THIS OR IS THAT JUST ITS ALL ENCOMPASSING THE SAME CRITERIA AS EVERYONE ELSE? IT'S JUST ALL IN TERMS OF THE FACT THERE'S NO CAPS FOR ANYONE WHO QUALIFIES OTHERWISE [INAUDIBLE]. IT'S THE SAME APPLICATION PROCESS I GUESS IS MY QUESTION.

YES. OK, THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION?

[01:05:01]

YES, TREASURER.

BEFORE I VOTE ON THIS, I DO WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR DRAFTING THIS AND BRINGING THIS BEFORE THE BOARD.

MANAGER WALSH, DIRECTOR CLARK, PLANNER MENSER, DIRECTOR KIESELBACH.

THIS IS A WELL THOUGHT OUT PLAN.

YOU'VE GOT SPECIFICS TO IT.

WE'VE AMENDED IT SLIGHTLY, BUT THE FRAMEWORK OF WHAT IS ESSENTIALLY THE ONE THAT YOU PRESENTED TO US. THIS BOARD SPOKE WHEN WE DID THIS FIVE OR SIX MONTHS AGO THAT WE THOUGHT WE KNEW WE'D NEED A SECOND ROUND.

IN FACT, WE DESPERATELY DO FOR OUR BUSINESSES.

AND I APPRECIATE THE GOOD STAFF WORK THAT BROUGHT US TO THE BOARD THIS TIME.

SO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR GOOD WORK.

I THINK WE ALL JOIN A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THOSE COMMENTS.

MR. OPSOMMER. I WOULD ECHO TREASURER DESCHAINE'S COMMENTS AND SENTIMENTS, I APPRECIATE DIRECTOR CLARK AND MANAGER WALSH BRINGING THIS VERY QUICKLY.

AND I NOTICED WHEN I KIND OF ENTERED INTO THIS DISCUSSION, AS IT RELATED TO OUR FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT, I SAW MANAGER WALSH MAKE A NOTE.

AND I JUST I THINK WE'RE WORKING VERY WELL IN TANDEM, IN UNISON, AND WE'RE GETTING A LOT DONE IN A VERY SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME THESE DAYS, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, A CREDIT TO MANAGEMENT AND THE BOARD WORKING EXTREMELY WELL TOGETHER AND OUR DIRECTORS EXECUTING EXTREMELY EFFICIENTLY.

SO I APPRECIATE HOW ROBUST THIS WAS.

AND I THINK WE'VE MADE A LOT OF IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE FIRST TIME AROUND, WHICH WAS STILL AN EXCEPTIONAL PROCESS.

BUT LOOKING AT THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE AND THE CHANGING NEEDS AND MAKING SURE WE'RE CASTING A BROAD NET.

SO I THINK STAFF'S INTUITION ON THAT WAS SPOT ON.

I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.

THE BEST PEOPLE LEARN FROM HISTORY AND WE'RE LEARNING FROM OUR HISTORY, WE IMPROVED WHAT WE DID JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO.

OK, ANYTHING ELSE? WE'LL HAVE A VOTE, MS. GUTHRIE. ALL RIGHT, TRUSTEE JACKSON.

YES. TRUSTEE OPSOMMER.

YES.

TRUSTEE SUNDLAND. TRUSTEE WISINSKI.

YES. SUPERVISOR STYKA.

YES. CLERK GUTHRIE VOTES, YES, AND TREASURER DESCHAINE.

YES. ALL RIGHT, MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO.

I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE ON THIS MANAGER, SIR, BEFORE WE GO OUT TO COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC? NO, JUST THANK YOU ON BEHALF OF THE STAFF AND CERTAINLY THE COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU FOR THIS. THIS IS JUST A GREAT EXAMPLE OF WHEN YOU HAVE A BOARD THAT WORKS REALLY WELL TOGETHER, THEY MANAGE THEIR FINANCES WELL FOR YEARS.

THEY HAVE A FUND THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO DO THIS WHERE THEY PROVIDE THIS AND A STAFF WHO CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN. AND WE'LL PUT A PRESS RELEASE OUT ABOUT THIS RIGHT AWAY.

AND DIRECTOR CLARK WILL OVERSEE THE PROGRAM AND WE'RE EXCITED TO MOVE FORWARD.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AND I APPRECIATE THE BOARD MOVING IT NOW RATHER THAN WAITING TILL THE JANUARY MEETING, BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE YEAR COMING AND, YOU KNOW, THERE'S VARIOUS TAX IMPLICATIONS THERE AND THE HOLIDAYS, YOU KNOW, THAT'S THE PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECT THAT IT'S GOING TO BE NOW. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, EVERYBODY.

NOW WE MOVE ON TO COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC.

IF MR. GEBES CAN HEAR US.

DO WE KNOW WHETHER WE HAVE ANYBODY THAT'S GOING TO COMMENT? WE WILL, OF COURSE, ALLOW PEOPLE TO RAISE HAND IN THE ATTENDEE AREA IF THEY CHOOSE TO.

ONCE AGAIN, FIVE ONE SEVEN THREE FOUR NINE ONE, TWO, THREE, TWO.

FOR ANYONE WHO MIGHT BE CALLING IN FROM THE HOMTV STREAM OR ANY OF THE VARIOUS INTERNET STREAMS. I'M NOT SEEING ANY HANDS GO UP IN THE ATTENDEE AREA AT THIS TIME.

AND I'M HEARING NO PHONES ANSWER.

GIVE IT ANOTHER HALF A MOMENT.

ALL RIGHT, WITH THAT ARE THERE OTHER MATTERS FROM THE BOARD? ANY BOARD MEMBERS HAVE ANYTHING THEY WANT TO BRING UP? WELL, VERY GOOD. HEY, MAYBE WE SHOULD HAVE MEETINGS AT NOON ALL THE TIME, WE GET DONE QUICKLY. ALL RIGHT.

WITH THAT, THEN WE NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

I MOVE TO ADJOURN.

MS. WISINSKI. ALL RIGHT.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF ADJOURNING, PUT YOUR HAND IN FRONT OF YOUR FACE.

SIX ZERO.

ONE ABSENT. WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU, EVERYBODY. THANK YOU.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS. HAPPY HOLIDAYS.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.